| A Study on the Interplay between Pull Request Review and Continuous Integration Builds
|
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/lyntljcsimcn2p8/AAD7mHQk3bOVm9EpQVDW0h0qa?dl=0 |
--- |
Online Storage |
Yes |
| A large-scale empirical study of just-in-time quality assurance
|
https://research.cs.queensu.ca/~kamei/jittse/jit.zip |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| An Empirical Study of Design Discussions in Code Review
|
https://github.com/software-rebels/DesignInCodeReviews-ESEM2018 |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| An empirical study of sentiments in code reviews
|
http://kin-y.github.io/miningReviewRepo/ |
https://github.com/kin-y/miningReviewRepo |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| An empirical study of the impact of modern code review practices on software quality
|
https://github.com/SAILResearch/replication-code_review_sw_quality_extension |
https://github.com/SAILResearch/replication-code_review_sw_quality_extension |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Are Fix-Inducing Changes a Moving Target? A Longitudinal Case Study of Just-In-Time Defect Prediction
|
https://github.com/software-rebels/JITMovingTarget |
https://github.com/software-rebels/JITMovingTarget |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Are developers aware of the architectural impact of their changes?
|
https://mhepaixao.github.io/architecture_awareness/ |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| Automatic Generation of Pull Request Descriptions
|
https://osf.io/m9t6f/?view_only=35c5846fe1d24458a3ed32b72254140f |
https://github.com/Tbabm/PRSummarizer |
Permanent Storage |
Yes |
| Automatically recommending code reviewers based on their expertise: An empirical comparison
|
https://www.uni-due.de/~hw0433/ |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| Broadcast vs. Unicast Review Technology: Does It Matter?
|
https://bitbucket.org/foundjem/ml-issuetk/src |
https://bitbucket.org/foundjem/ml-issuetk/src |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Other |
| Confusion in Code Reviews: Reasons, Impacts, and Coping Strategies
|
https://github.com/felipeebert/confusion-code-reviews |
https://github.com/felipeebert/confusion-in-code-reviews |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Convergent contemporary software peer review practices
|
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2487085.2487095 |
--- |
Reference to Existing Dataset |
Yes |
| Decoding the Representation of Code in the Brain: An fMRI Study of Code Review and Expertise
|
http://dijkstra.cs.virginia.edu/fmri/ |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| Four eyes are better than two: On the impact of code reviews on software quality
|
https://www.arrestedcomputing.com/readability/readability.jar |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| How Developers Document Pull Requests with External References
|
http://tinyurl.com/pull-resourcesreplication |
--- |
--- |
No |
| How do Multiple Pull Requests Change the Same Code: A Study of Competing Pull Requests in GitHub
|
http://cstar.whu.edu.cn/p/cpr/ |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Identifying the characteristics of vulnerable code changes: an empirical study
|
http://amiangshu.com/VCC/index.html |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| Interactive Code Review for Systematic Changes
|
https://sites.google.com/a/utexas.edu/critics/ |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Investigating Code Review Practices in Defective Files: An Empirical Study of the Qt System
|
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2487085.2487096 |
--- |
Reference to Existing Dataset |
No |
| Investigating code review quality: Do people and participation matter?
|
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~okononen/bugzilla_public_db.zip |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| Investigating technical and non-technical factors influencing modern code review
|
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~obaysal/webkit_data.sqlite |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
No |
| Predicting Usefulness of Code Review Comments Using Textual Features and Developer Experience
|
https://homepage.usask.ca/masud.rahman/revhelper |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| Process Mining Multiple Repositories for Software Defect Resolution from Control and Organization Perspective
|
https://github.com/Mining-multiple-reposdata/experimental |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
No |
| Rebasing in Code Review Considered Harmful: A Large-Scale Empirical Investigation
|
https://zenodo.org/record/3354510\#.X1i3W2czbLA |
--- |
Permanent Storage |
Yes |
| Review participation in modern code review
|
https://github.com/SAILResearch/replication-participation_code_review |
https://github.com/SAILResearch/replication-participation_code_review |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Reviewer recommendation for pull-requests in GitHub: What can we learn from code review and bug assignment?
|
https://github.com/yuyue/pullreq_ci |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Revisiting Code Ownership and Its Relationship with Software Quality in the Scope of Modern Code Review
|
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2487085.2487096 |
--- |
Reference to Existing Dataset |
No |
| Search-Based Peer Reviewers Recommendation in Modern Code Review
|
http://kin-y.github.io/miningReviewRepo/ |
https://github.com/kin-y/miningReviewRepo |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| Studying Pull Request Merges: A Case Study of Shopify's Active Merchant
|
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~okononen/shopify |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| Studying the Impact of Adopting Continuous Integration on the Delivery Time of Pull Requests
|
https://prdeliverydelay.GitHub.io/\#datasets |
https://github.com/paluno/ExpertiseExplorer |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| Test-Driven Code Review: An Empirical Study
|
https://www.mediafire.com/folder/3b5ey849y9flx/Test-Driven_Code_Review_-_Online_Appendix |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| The Impact of Human Discussions on Just-in-Time Quality assurance: An Empirical Study on OpenStack and Eclipse
|
http://gsyc.es/~jgb/repro/2015-msr-grimoire-data |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| The Review Linkage Graph for Code Review Analytics: A Recovery Approach and Empirical Study
|
https://github.com/software-rebels/ReviewLinkageGraph |
--- |
Personal/University |
Yes |
| The impact of code review coverage and code review participation on software quality: a case study of the qt, VTK, and ITK projects
|
https://github.com/SAILResearch/replication-code_review_sw_quality |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| The impact of human factors on the participation decision of reviewers in modern code review
|
https://github.com/sruangwan/replication-human-factors-code-review/ |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| The influence of non-technical factors on code review
|
https://cs.uwaterloo.ca/~obaysal/webkit_data.sqlite |
--- |
Personal/University |
No |
| When Testing Meets Code Review: Why and How Developers Review Tests
|
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1172419 |
--- |
Permanent Storage |
Yes |
| Who should review my code? A file location-based code-reviewer recommendation approach for Modern Code Review
|
http://github.com/patanamon/revfinder |
http://github.com/patanamon/revfinder |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Who should review this change?: Putting text and file location analyses together for more accurate recommendations
|
https://github.com/patanamon/revfinder |
https://github.com/patanamon/revfinder |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Why are Commits Being Reverted?: A Comparative Study of Industrial and Open Source Projects
|
https://github.com/yiu31802/icsme2016 |
--- |
GitHub/BitBucket |
Yes |
| Would static analysis tools help developers with code reviews?
|
http://ser.soccerlab.polymtl.ca/ser-repos/public/tr-data/2015-saner-code-reviews.zip |
--- |
Personal/University |
Other |